Tuesday, November 15, 2011

Lecture 7 Notes


Lecture 7 – The Structure of Government:

In part two we start looking at the structures of government in greater detail. Therefore we will look at the various parts of Government – the Crown, the Privy Council, The Prime Minister and Cabinet, The Civil Serivce, as well as local, and regional government structures.

  1. The Crown:

All actions of government are taken in the name of the crown. The King or the Queen of England is the head of government. The United Kingdom is a constitutional Monarchy, and the Crown is also the symbolic head of all three arms of government – the Judiciary, the Executive and the Legislature.

However, it is important to remember that the role of the queen is largely informal/ceremonial. The UK is a constitutional monarchy, and the crown is only the symbolic head and of the three arms of government.

The Act of Settlement of 1701 prescribes succession to the Crown is determined. It expressly removes Roman Catholics (or anyone married to a Roman Catholic) from consideration as heirs. (why? The Monarch is also the head of the Church of England). Succession to the Crown is also structured to give male heirs precedence over female heirs. If the Monarch is incapable of performing his or her role, under the Regency Act of 1937, Counsellors of State may be appointed to fulfill his/her duties. 

The Monarchy is funded by the Civil List – this allows for all expenses related to the official business of the Monarch to be funded by the state from the consolidated fund. The Sovereign is not liable to pay tax for the income she receives from the state, but voluntarily started doing so in 1993.

A lot of the specific duties assigned to the monarch have already been discussed in our class on the Royal Preroragtive. But the role of the Queen in government has been described by Walter Bagehot as including “The right to be consulted, the right to encourage and the right to warn”. Thus even today, the Queen continues to play a key advisory role in government by:
  • Assenting to bills
  • Calling & Dissolving Parliament
  • Etc.

In addition, the Queen receives copies of all significant government papers – cabinet papers, diplomatic reports etc.

She also has a weekly audience with the Prime Minister, where she is given an opportunity to air her views on all relevant matters. The Audience last 30min – 1 hour.

The relationship between the Queen and the Prime Minister is summed up in a letter from the queen’s Private Secretary to the crown dated 29th July, 1986. The letter was written in response to a story that the social policies of Margaret Thatcher were causing the queen ‘dismay’.
  1. The sovereign has a right and a duty to counsel, encourage and warn her government. She is thus entitled to have opinions on government policy.
  2. Whatever the queen’s personal opinion might be, she is bound to act on the advice and support of her ministers.
  3. The sovereign is obliged to treat all communications with the PM as confidential

The Privy Council
The Privy Council is a group consisting of the Monarch’s closest advisors. The modern day cabinet has its historical origins in the Privy Council. “Privy” means private – all meetings of the council are held in private. The Council is made up of all cabinet members, ambassadors, former and present speakers, clerics and judges. The Council also performs judicial functions, which are for the most part delegated to the Judicial Committee. The Committee consists of senior judges appointed as Privy Counsellors: Senior Judges from the Britain, Scotland and Northern Ireland are all members of the Council. It was formerly a supreme court of appeal for the entire British Empire, and continues to hear appeals from British Overseas Territories, Sovereign Base Areas, Crown Dependencies and some Commonwealth countries.

The Council’s historical origins arise from the traditional councilors that had historically surrounded the monarchy. Eventually, jurisdictional disputes between the powers exercised by the privy council (especially by the privy councils judicial arm, which was known as the Court of Star Chamber) led to the council’s legislative powers being reduced, and to the judicial powers of the council being abolished altogether. However, as discussed above, the Privy Council still maintains some Judicial Power over British colonies and overseas territories. It also hears disputes connected to the devolution of legislative powers to assemblies in Northern Ireland, Wales and Scotland.

The Privy Council has about 400 members. The quorum of the council is 3. Hence the complaint by Maitland about its potentially undemocratic nature; it allows the work of government to fall into the hands of a small group of individuals – e.g. the King, acting with the Lord Chancellor and the Lord Privy Seal, the First Lord/Secretary of the treasury.

Prime Minister

The position of Prime minister was created in the later part of the 18th Century. It was largely created by Convention. Consequently, his role is not set down in any code or statute. Even though the prime minister is supposed to be the first among equals, the extent of power which he has suggests otherwise. The Prime Minister is, for example –

The First Lord of the Treasury
The Minister for the Civil Service

The Prime Minister appoints and dismisses ministers - The Prime Minister also has the right to ask a member of cabinet to resign – and if that cabinet member does not resign, the Prime Minister can ask the queen to remove that cabinet member.

The Prime Minister also determines which ministers become cabinet ministers. 
Going to war, signing treaties – a lot of the powers of the crown which the crown ostensibly exercises under the royal prerogative are actually exercised by the prime minister

The Prime Minister is appointed by the monarch – By convention, the Monarch appoints the leader of the party that wins the most seats in the last parliamentary election.  By convention, the Prime Minister has always been a member of the House of Commons. The last prime minister who acted in that capacity from the House of Lords resigned as recently as 1902. However, it has become increasingly apparent that this is an office that is best held by a person who is a member of the House of Commons. There are a number of practical reasons why this should be the case, the main one being that the prime minister must be held accountable to the electorate through parliament.

The first task of the prime minister is to choose his cabinet. Once in office, Again – this is a task that is technically done by the queen. In practice (and by convention) it is the Prime Minister who determines who should become a member of Cabinet. The Prime Minister also determines the size of the cabinet, the agenda of cabinet meetings, and controls the number and role of cabinet committees.




The Cabinet
The Cabinet consists (normally) of approximately 20 senior members of the government. For example, if you look at the current list of cabinet members it includes:


Cabinet of the United Kingdom[8][9]
Portfolio
Minister

The Rt Hon. David Cameron MP
Deputy Prime Minister
Lord President of the Council
(special responsibility for political & constitutional reform)

The Rt Hon. Nick Clegg MP

The Rt Hon. William Hague MP

The Rt Hon. George Osborne MP

The Rt Hon. Kenneth Clarke QC MP

The Rt Hon. Theresa May MP

The Rt Hon. Dr Liam Fox MP

The Rt Hon. Dr Vince Cable MP

The Rt Hon. Iain Duncan Smith MP

The Rt Hon. Chris Huhne MP

The Rt Hon. Andrew Lansley CBE MP

The Rt Hon. Michael Gove MP

The Rt Hon. Eric Pickles MP

The Rt Hon. Philip Hammond MP

The Rt Hon. Caroline Spelman MP

The Rt Hon. Andrew Mitchell MP

The Rt Hon. Owen Paterson MP
Secretary of State for Scotland
(providing ministerial support to the Deputy Prime Minister in the Cabinet Office)

The Rt Hon. Michael Moore MP

The Rt Hon. Cheryl Gillan MP

The Rt Hon. Jeremy Hunt MP

The Rt Hon. Danny Alexander MP

The Rt Hon. The Lord Strathclyde PC

The Rt Hon. The Baroness Warsi PC


Role and Function of Cabinet – Cabinet is where government policies are formulated, initiated and implemented. It is the central decision making body of the government. Different governments have used cabinets in different ways, so the level of importance or the level of influence that a parliament has really depends on the circumstances of a particular government and even on the personality of the prime minister. Strong prime ministers tend to dominate their cabinets. Weak prime ministers are dominated by them. Sometimes, they are a function of internal party compromises. (Labor, Blair and Brown).

But even the strongest of Prime ministers must govern with the support of a cabinet i.e. Thus, Margaret Thatcher, who was one of the strongest PMs in the last century, was compelled to resign when she lost support of the cabinet.

How does cabinet function – the decisions are taken as a whole – but cabinet often functions through cabinet committees. Sometimes formed to address particular matters – perhaps security, perhaps economic issues in the time of a crisis.

The Committee system brings us back to our discussion of collective and individual ministerial responsibility. (who can refresh our memories about that)
 Page 270 of Barnett
Collective – joint responsibility – flouted by any minister, said minister must resign.

Also – Individual responsibility – for actions in one department, for scandals, etc. in another department.

The daily functioning of the parliament is governed by the Cabinet Office, which is run by the Secretary to the Cabinet.

The Civil Service:



Defined as a “ a servant of the crown, other than holders of political or judicial office, who is employed in a civil capacity and whose renumeration is paid wholly and directly out of monies voted by parliament.

The civil service provides administrative support for various government ministries. Ministerial appointments are transient, temporary and ministers are often reshuffled. So Civil servants provide a level of permanence and stability within the various ministries to ensure that they continue to run smoothly when ministers are replaced.

Civil Servants are there permanently – they are servants of the crown and hold their offices “ at the pleasure of the crown”. This means, in theory that their appointments can be revoked quite easily. In practice however, Civil Servants have a number of laws that gives them a fair amount of security and permanence within their agencies.

Civil Servants must, to the greatest extent possible, be politically neutral. Their loyalty should not be to any particular government – their loyalty should be to the government of the day. As a result, some categories of senior civil servants are prohibited from engaging in national politics (though they may take part in local politics)

The Civil Service – for the purposes of political neutrality – is divided into three categories;

These are:
  1. The politically free category- i.e. industrial staff, non officer grades, who may engage freely in either national or local politics;
  2. The politically restricted category compromising of higher staff grades who are debarred from participating in national political activities; but may be permitted to engage in local politics;
  3. An intermediate group which compromises of those who are neither employed by the highest or the lowest grades.



Also, as a result of this, Civil Servants must maintain a veil of anonymity – they are shielded from public life and their actions are shielded from parliamentary scrutiny. For e.g. they do not appear in parliament to defend actions taken by a particular ministry – that is left for the minister. Also, the advise that they give ministers on particular issues is private.

See in Re M; The Government and the Courts;

Before the Crown Proceedings Act of 1947, two main principles governed the question of the legal liability of the crown. The first of these was that the ‘King could no wrong’ i.e. he could not be held liable for any actions which would be unlawful if they were committed by individuals. The second rule was that the King could not be sued in his own courts. These two basic principles served to insulate the king from legal action.

As the range of governmental powers increased, these principles became problematic – in particular, they weakened the legal protections available to citizens against rights abuses by officers and agents of the crown. The CPA of 1947 permitted actions to be brought against the Crown. It allowed for actions to be brought against specific government agencies, or where there was no specific government agency, against the Attorney-General.

However, remedies against the Crown are limited to declarations – i.e. no orders of specific performance. However, in M v Home Office, it was held that an injunction could be granted against a minister personally who is acting in his official capacity.

Also, EU law requires that rights are given sufficient enforcement within the EU system. In the case of R v Secretary of Transport, Ex Parte Factortame, an issue arose as to whether any damages could lie for a losses that arose as a result of the passage of legislation. Ordinarily, damages would not lie for such a breach. But the court held that “a national court, which in a case before it concerning Community Law, considers the sole obstacle which precludes it from granting relief is a national law must set aside that rule” The court based its decision on the international law principles of liability – which made no distinctions as to where the breach comes from.
 [In] international law a State whose liability for breach of an international commitment is in issue will be viewed as a single entity irrespective of whether the breach which gave rise to the damage is attributable to the legislature, the judiciary or the executive. This must apply a fortiori in the Community legal order since all State authorities including the legislature, are bound in performing their tasks to comply with the rules laid down by Community law directly governing the situation of individuals.

The decision in Factortame was based on earlier decision in Francovich v Italy (1991) (Facts – whether remedies under EU law was available to some laid of Italian Factory workers) in which the court held that;
[t]he full effectiveness of Community rules would be impaired and the protection of the rights which they grant would be weakened if individuals were unable to obtain redress when their rights are infringed by a breach of Community law for which a Member State can be held responsible. 
... 
A further basis ... is to be found in article 5 of the Treaty, under which the Member States are required to take all appropriate measures, whether general or particular, to ensure fulfilment of their obligations under Community law. Among these is the obligation to nullify the unlawful consequences of a breach of Community law 


Questions:
What kind of government does the UK have today – Parliamentary, Prime Ministerial or Cabinet?


Regional Government and the devolution of Power –
In recent times, there have been efforts to devolve power in England to the various regions. England, as you know, is divided into 4 regions. (Namely - ) Since 1998, there has been a process in place to give greater power to the four regions has taken place through a process called “devolution” – firstly what is devolution – how would you define it. One way to define devolution is given by Professor Bogdanor – who teaches government at oxford university is to define “The process of devolution involves the dispersal of power from a superior to an inferior political authority. More precisely, it consists of three elements: the transfer to a subordinate elected body on a geographical basis, of functions at present exercised by parliament. These functions may be either legislative, the power to make laws or executive, the power to make decisions within an established legal framework”

You can see from this definition that one of the key features of devolution is the transfer of power from a higher parliament i.e. the Westminster Parliament to a lower Parliament i.e. the parliaments that have been created in NI, Scotland and Wales. You can see therefore that the subordinate legislatures do not have the same power as the Westminster parliament. This is why some do not consider devolution as creating a federal state in the United Kingdom as the ultimate source of power still remains win the legislature.

But it is debatable because as we shall see, some executive power is also transferred from Westminster to the regions.

Let’s begin by a discussion of devolution of power in Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland:
Wales devolution there has always been somewhat high on the popular agenda especially in the last 30 years or so. The events that led to the creation of the Welsh parliament was the election of the labor government in 1997. Prior to being elected, the Blair Government had mentioned in its manifesto that devolution to Wales was one of the policies that it would pursue should it win the election. Shortly after it came into power, a referendum was held to ask the people of Wales if they would like an assembly. A slight majority of people said yes. As a result the Government of Wales Bill (1998) was passed which introduced, for the first time, a Welsh Assembly.

The Welsh Assembly is imbued with some limited lawmaking powers. The assembly nominates a First Minister, who will then be appointed by the Queen. The assembly also allows for the appointment of up to 12 ministerial positions. The Assembly has a total of 60 elected members.

The assembly can pass laws that are within the scope of its legislative competence. There are 20 fields within which the Welsh Parliament can legislate. These are agriculture, fisheries, forestry, rural development, health, local government, social welfare, town and country planning etc. So the Parliament at Westminster still maintains authority over other matters .e.g. foreign policy, security, international trade.

Scotland
The movement for devolution in Scotland developed in the 1960’s and again it was driven by strong support from Labor MPs. A bill allowing for the creation of a Scottish assembly was passed as far back as 1978. But it did not go into effect immediately as it required a referendum before it could be passed. And an attempt to have it passed by referendum in 1978 was unsuccessful.

Again it was the election of Labor in 1997 that led to the passage of the Scotland Act.

The Scottish Parliament consists of 129 members. Each parliament lasts for a fixed term of four years. The executive consists of a first minister, a Lord Advocate who serves as a solicitor general for Scotland, and for the appointment of ministers and deputy ministers.

In respect of law making powers, the Scottish Assembly has the power to pass laws, which are known as Acts of the Scottish Parliament. However, the Scottish Parliament cannot make any law that affects the power of the Westminster Parliament to make laws for Scotland. There are also more specific restrictions placed on the Scottish Parliament – it cannot, for example, pass laws that affect the union between Scotland and England (Act of Union cannot be amended) – in fact, the Scotland Act states clearly that it is subject to the Act of Union, it cannot pass certain kinds of laws concerning the defence and foreign affairs. There are also a number of Specific reservations that can be found throughout the Scotland Act.

Where there is a dispute as to whether or not the Scottish Assembly can pass laws on a subject, the dispute is referred to the Privy Council for determination.

Devolution in Northern Ireland is provided for by the Northern Ireland Act.

Similar – Devolution came to Northern Ireland with the passage of the Northern Ireland Act of 1998. It created an executive consisting of a first ministers and a deputy first minister. All ministers in Scotland must swear allegiance to the Scottish peace process. The assembly is also prohibited from passing certain kinds of legislation, and is subject to the ability of the Westminster Parliament to pass laws governing it.

Impact of Devolution – The English Question

Impractical, which questions have only English implications. Then you create a system where you basically have two tracks of MPs.

Local Government in England & Wales

England is divided into 9 regions:

Under these regional divisions are subdivisions at the County Level, at the District Levels

London is a special region of its own and has a different local government structures – its divided into boroughs and has various borough councils. Local governments are given certain specific functions by statute – i.e. refuse collection, street lighting, state schools, and participate in the running of local law enforcement agencies.

They also regulate things such as taxi licenses, child care facilities etc.



Lecture 6 Notes


Parliamentary Sovereignty
Lecture 6

Admin Matters:

  • Kindly go to the blog – follow me on the blog, that way, you get to know when there are updates to the blog.
  • Schedule for early November while I am in India.
  •  


It’s a concept that runs through our study of the UK constitution. And its a concept that has been described as the cornerstone of the constitution.

The first thing we need to understand is what we mean by sovereignty – by sovereignty, we are essentially talking about supremacy.

·         the difference between political and legal sovereignty
·         The origins of the concept of
·         The effect and the scope of the concept
·         Explain the importance of replied repeal
·         And also discuss what it membership of the EU and the Human Rights Act does and does not do to the concept

Political and Legal Sovereignty  -

The ultimate authority within the state is both political and legal.

Political sovereignty lies with the people.

  • There are various ways in which one can capture the idea of sovereignty within the state coming from the people. Various social contract theorists have captured this belief in different ways. For example:

  • According to Thomas Hobbes, man is by nature incapable of regulating his life and therefore has to give over power to a sovereign in the interest of maintaining law and order. Without which life would be – solitary, nasty brutish and short.

  • Rousseau – talked about the idea of state sovereignty arising from the collective will of the people. The state embodies the general will of the people. Government exercises this sovereignty on behalf of the people.

  • Paine, Locke – had a rights based notion of sovereignty – i.e. citizens give up some rights to the state on a conditional basis  - power is in effect held in trust by the government for the people and if the trust is broken.

What we are concerned with in this lesson is the concept of legal sovereignty – how would we define the concept of legal sovereignty. Legal sovereignty resides with parliament. But parliament exercise this authority on behalf of the people.

  • What is the relationship between the two? Political sovereignty actually legitimizes legal sovereignty. At the heart of the concept of parliamentary sovereignty lies the relationship between parliament and the executive. i.e. parliament is supreme because the courts recognize them as supreme.

  • This can be described in Kelsenian terms as the Grundnorm of the constitution – i.e. the rule upon which all rules are built. Parliamentary supremacy has been recognized by the courts since 1688. The removal of James II, the replacement of James II with William of Orange, and the signing of the Bill of Rights were the events that cemented the concept of Parliamentary Sovereignty in the UK constitution. i.e. It arose out of the continuing conflict between the king and the crown for political power. As we discussed when we had our lesson on the sources of the UK constitution, the key century in the struggle between the crown and parliament for political power was the 16th Century . The then King – Charles, abused his authority in the opinion of parliament by ruling the royal prerogative rather than parliament – this led to civil war and ultimately to the execution of Charles. After about a decade of being a republic, the monarchy was restored, but again there conflicts between parliament and the crown – this time over religion as James was catholic and England was, by then, a protestant nation. Ultimately James was chased into exile, and parliament replaced James with a new set of Monarh’s William and Mary from the House of Orange (in Holland) but they replaced them on their terms  - one of the key terms of course was that parliament would be supreme.

This supremacy was enshrined in THE BILL OF RIGHTS of 1689 – from this point onwards, the supremacy of parliament over the crown was undisputed.

  • Ex parte Canon Selwyn
“there is no judicial body in the country by which the validity of an Act of Parliament could be questioned. An Act of the legislature is superior in authority to any court of law. We have only to administer the law as we find it, and no court could pronounce a judgment as to the validity of an Act of Parliament”.


Legal Sovereignty
This a legal concept – the concept of the supremacy of parliament is derived from the common law – judges have given it recognition. When we were discussing both separation of powers and the rule of law, we stated that when judges are interpreting statutes, what do they do – the seek to give effect to the will of parliament – not just the will of parliament but the most recent expression of the will of parliament. 


Let’s look, as we often do – at Dicey’s formulation of the concept. For Dice – Parliamentary Soverignty meant three things –

A.V. Dicey’s analysis of sovereignty
In Dicey’s view, parliamentary sovereignty entails three principal aspects. Each of these
needs to be studied with care:

a Parliament – the supreme law-making body – may legislate on any subject-matter.
b No Parliament can be restricted by a predecessor or restrict the power of a future
Parliament.
c No body, including a court of law, may question the validity of Acts of Parliament.


  1. Parliament may legislate on any subject matter

Parliament’s power remains theoretically absolute – i.e. it can pass any law on any subject matter.

This means it can pass laws that have an effect outside of the United Kingdom. Aviation Security Act – criminalizes acts of hijacking irrespective of wherever in the world it takes place
It can legislate retrospectively – i.e. it can make an action unlawful at a time when, at the time it was committed, the Act was lawful.

 War Crimes Act – allows for the trial of things that took place during the second world – this was an Act which was passed in 1990.

Retrospective legislation as in Burmah Oil v Lord Advocate (1965)
And you can see it in the treatment of international law – international treaties have no effect in the UK until they are passed by into domestic law by an act of parliament.

Parliament may even abolish itself and reconstitute itself – under the Acts of Union – Parliament of England Abolished, and a new joint parliament of England and Wales is established.


However, there obviously practical limitations on the matters that parliament can legislate on.

Independence statutes, cannot take independence away from the colonies:
Parliament may pass a law declaring all private property – what would be the political consequences of such a law. This does not mean that parliament would never legislate an impossibility
Madzimbamuto v Lardner-Burke (1969) – detained by the government of Ian Smith  under the UDI.

Challenge the validity of the Act before the Privy Council – Lord Reid said It is often said that it would be unconstitutional for the UK parliament to do certain things – meaning that the moral, political or other reasons  against doing them are so strong that most people would regard it as highly improper if Parliament does these things. But that does not mean that it is beyond the power of parliament to do these things. Parliament chose to do any of them, the courts would not hold the act of parliament invalid.

  • Madzimbabuto v Lardner-Burke (1969)

It is often said that the it would be unconstitutional for the UK Parliament to do certain things, meaning that the moral, political and other reasons against doing them are so strong that most people would consider doing those things to be highly improper . But that does not mean that it is beyond the power of Parliament to do such things. If parliament chose to do any of them, the courts could not hold an act of parliament to be invalid.



B.   No parliament can be restricted by a predecessor, or can restrict the power of a future parliament.
Vauxhall Estates v Liverpool Corporation –
So if there is a conflict between a statute that was passed in say 1919 and a statute that was passed in 1925, which will expression of parliamentary intent will the courts uphold?

The most recent one – this is the ruling of the court in Vauxhall Estates v Liverpool Corporation. (1932) KB 733. This is what is known as the doctrine of implied repeal – when one finds two acts of parliament that contradict each other, they later one repeals the earlier one. Conflict between two acts which gave two different levels of compensation – one passed in 1925, the other 1919.

Ellen Street Estates v Minister of Health (1934); “The legislature cannot, according to our constitution, bind itself as to the form of subsequent legislation, and it is impossible for parliament to enact that in a subsequent statute dealing with the same subject matter there can be no implied repeal. If in a subsequent Act parliament chooses to make it plain that he earlier statute us being to some extent repealed, effect must be given to that intention just because it is the will of the legislature.”

But – this doctrine has been held to be inapplicable to acts of Major constitutional importance:

Scottish Act of Union – which seeks to create a permanent Union with Scotland


Macormick v Lord Advocate cases/Gibson v Lord Advocate

What is the legal effect of the Act of Union between the England and Scotland. Which were separate countries – James I of England, was also James VI of Scotland

Article I of the act stated that the two countries shall be a union”forever after” but stated obiter that supremacy is part of English law, never been part of Scottish law.

But we have to examine it again in the manner and form cases – argument that if parliament prescribes a manner in which an act may be changed, then that procedure should be followed .e.g. if parliament suggests that there should be referendum.

European Cases – Impact:
Section 2(4) of the European Communities Act of 1972 – This provides that “ANY ENACTMENT PASSED OR TO BE PASSED…SHALL BE CONSTRUED AND HAVE EFFECT ACCORDING TO THE FOREGOING PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION” – I.E. THAT ACTS OF PARLIAMENT MUST BE CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH EUROPEAN COMMUNITY LAW.

R v Sec of State for Transport, ex Parte Factortame
Merchant Shipping Act disapplied as being contra EU law.

Attorney-General for New South Wales v Trewothan (1932) – s. 5 of the Colonial Laws validity Act, 1865 – i.e. required for the laws – specific form should be followed, otherwise assent would be invalid – Privy Council

Devolution – specific, frequent references were made in which the parliaments of all the devolved home territories were made subservient to the UK parliament.  

C.   Nobody may question the validity of an Act of Parliament, including a court of law

We have seen this in respect of the attitudes of the courts towards an Act of Parliament – i.e. to give effect to the will of the legislature.

This is given effect to in two ways – one ways is through the Enrolled Bill Rule “which simply states that once a Bill has passed through the requisite parliamentary stages and received royal assent, parliament will not look into how it was passed, even in the even of a defect in the passage of the bill.”

Pickin v British Railway Board. 1974 AC 765

Contemporary Issues and Sovereignty

What is the impact of EU membership on parliamentary sovereignty?

Domesticated – i.e. the treaty of rome has the force of law in the UK because it has been passed by the UK parliament under the statute called the European Communities Act of 1972.

EU bodies intend for EU law to be higher thab domestic law, to supercede this. But how have judges treated this. Section 2(4) of the EU



Human Rights Act – what is the impact on sovereignty – remember the law has actually been domesticated. This means that that it can be applied domestically rather than locally. However, its applied in a way that does not challenge the sovereignty of parliament. If a domestic act is declared contrary to a UK act, the courts refers the offending act back to parliament for parliament to review. It does not invalidate the act the way the Supreme Court of Ghana would, for example.




Discussion:
Jackson v Attorney-General (2005)
The Classic account given by Dicey of the doctrine of the supremacy of Parliament – pure and absolute as it was, can now be seen to be out of place in the modern United Kingdom. Nevertheless, the supremacy of parliament is still the general principle of our constitution. It is a construct of the common law. The judges created this principle. If that is so, it is not unthinkable that circumstances will arise when the courts may have to qualify a principle established on a different hypotheses of constitutionalism. (Lord Steyn)

Our constitution is dominated by the sovereignty of parliament. But parliamentary sovereignty is no longer, if it ever was, absolute. (Lord Hope)